On Tuesday 18 June 2002 20:36, Jeff Kell wrote: > I don't think I made myself clear when... > > > On Tue, 18 Jun 2002, Jeff Kell wrote: > > > I'm noticing a growing number of scans of four ports (1433, 8000, 3128, > > > and 8080, in succession from increasing source ports). These are > > > MS-SQL, WinAmp, Ring Zero, and HTTP proxy. 3128 = squid. Older versions of squid where standard 8080, but the newer versions use port 3128 as default. I'm seeing a lot of 8080 scans here lately. Lot of people looking for open proxy's ?? > > The individual scans are nothing new and rather well-known. What DOES > bother me is the pattern -- those four ports are scanned, in succession, > within a second or two, and it moves on to another host. And this same > 4-port-scan sequence I have seen from various geographic sources. What > are the odds that all those scans, in that sequence, are coincidence? > Slim to none, I'd wager; it sounds like either a new scanning tool or, > worse still, some new worm trying to propagate itself through exploits > based on those ports. > > Jeff > > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- >- This list is provided by the SecurityFocus ARIS analyzer service. > For more information on this free incident handling, management > and tracking system please see: http://aris.securityfocus.com -- Met vriendelijke groet, ---------------------------------------------------- Barry Kostjens | Red Hat Certified Engineer Internet Limburg | http://www.ilimburg.nl ---------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- This list is provided by the SecurityFocus ARIS analyzer service. For more information on this free incident handling, management and tracking system please see: http://aris.securityfocus.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Wed Jun 19 2002 - 09:14:49 PDT