RE: California State Bill SB1386

From: Jonathan A. Zdziarski (jonathanat_private)
Date: Mon Mar 24 2003 - 11:01:56 PST

  • Next message: Rohrer, Mark E: "RE: California State Bill SB1386"

    > the fundamental question of what defines encryption, so far as
    
    The question is not what defines encryption but what defines
    unencryption...plain text that is...if enough information has been
    transmitted that it could be reasonably converted into plain text, it should
    be reported...the bill was probably written this specific way to avoid a
    debate about what encryption is.  It doesn't seem to matter what method you
    use...the question is whether or not it can be reasonably converted to plain
    text.  If ROT-13 was used, that's reasonable... if a high-bit key was used,
    is only reasonable if the key was also stolen or if there is reason to
    believe enough information got out to launch a reasonable cryptanalysis.
    
    
    
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Powerful Anti-Spam Management and More...
    SurfControl E-mail Filter puts the brakes on spam,
    viruses and malicious code. Safeguard your business
    critical communications. Download a free 30-day trial:
    http://www.surfcontrol.com/go/zsfihl1
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Wed Mar 26 2003 - 15:32:35 PST