Kent Crispin wrote: > On Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 07:42:02PM +0000, David Wagner wrote: > [...] > > > see. However, in the short run I know everyone would like to get > > things working just in the simple case of a single module per process > > (and I think this view makes a *lot* of sense), > > Just to be sure I understand -- you mean a model where there is a > module and an associated userspace security server, don't you? Or am I > missing something? "associated userspace security server"? Huh? I don't get it. Crispin -- Crispin Cowan, Ph.D. Chief Scientist, WireX Communications, Inc. http://wirex.com Security Hardened Linux Distribution: http://immunix.org _______________________________________________ linux-security-module mailing list linux-security-moduleat_private http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Tue Apr 24 2001 - 17:07:18 PDT