On Tue, 1 May 2001, Devdas Bhagat wrote: > On Tue, 01 May 2001, jmjonesat_private spewed into the ether: > > (e.g, a list of calls, a well known program, etcetera?) "spewed into the ether".... hrm, how poetic, and true. > How about testing this under a heavy load? I mean really heavy > (slashdot effect?) Define "really heavy"? My production servers rarely go above 0.75. You talking about >2.0? I guess it'd be easy enough to run a table at different loads, although I'm not sure the relative results would be much different... although, I guess, because the hooks are positioned in the kernel, and therefore get monster priority, they COULD be. > > > Also, if anybody is interested in helping with the documentation > > (Code->English/*) translation for this project so we can all end > > up with an authoritative document to help build/rebuild LSMs, I'm > > interested in getting started on that, so let me know. > Let me see if I can pull out the time. No commits, but I'll try. Thanks. > > Devdas Bhagat > -- > I use technology in order to hate it more properly. > -- Nam June Paik > Excellent Quote!! J. Melvin Jones |>------------------------------------------------------ || J. MELVIN JONES jmjonesat_private |>------------------------------------------------------ || Microcomputer Systems Consultant || Software Developer || Web Site Design, Hosting, and Administration || Network and Systems Administration |>------------------------------------------------------ || http://www.jmjones.com/ |>------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ linux-security-module mailing list linux-security-moduleat_private http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Tue May 01 2001 - 10:31:48 PDT