Re: 2001-05-27 patch against 2.4.5

From: Bruj0 (bruj0at_private)
Date: Tue May 29 2001 - 12:13:11 PDT

  • Next message: Stephen Smalley: "Re: 2001-05-27 patch against 2.4.5"

    On Mon, 28 May 2001 21:34:00 -0700
    Greg KH <gregat_private> wrote:
    > You're right with your patch.  Here's the whole thing against a clean
    > 2.4.5 for those wanting to try this at home.
    > And yes, it doesn't seem to boot, but I don't think the do_umount change
    > caused this.
    > Time to dig up my serial cable, or let Chris fix it :)
    May i offer an option?
    With that i made almost all kinsider, i didnt have to reboot my machine (coz of me referencing a null ptr). Basically you get a: 	./linux    binary that runs a kernel on top of the real kernel. Its a 100% pure kernel, only hooks and lil changes are made to the kernel that runs UML. And never to the real kernel.
    PS: sorry for me broken english :)
    linux-security-module mailing list

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Tue May 29 2001 - 12:11:51 PDT