Re: 2001-05-27 patch against 2.4.5

Previous message: Stephen Smalley: "Re: Append vs. write distinctions"
Maybe in reply to: Greg KH: "2001-05-27 patch against 2.4.5"
Reply: jmjonesat_private: "Re: 2001-05-27 patch against 2.4.5"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

bruj0at_private

On Mon, 28 May 2001 21:34:00 -0700
Greg KH <gregat_private> wrote:

> You're right with your patch.  Here's the whole thing against a clean
> 2.4.5 for those wanting to try this at home.
> 
> And yes, it doesn't seem to boot, but I don't think the do_umount change
> caused this.
> Time to dig up my serial cable, or let Chris fix it :)
> 
May i offer an option? 
	http://user-mode-linux.sourceforge.net/

With that i made almost all kinsider, i didnt have to reboot my machine (coz of me referencing a null ptr). Basically you get a: 	./linux    binary that runs a kernel on top of the real kernel. Its a 100% pure kernel, only hooks and lil changes are made to the kernel that runs UML. And never to the real kernel.

PS: sorry for me broken english :)
bruj0-

_______________________________________________
linux-security-module mailing list
linux-security-moduleat_private
http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module