Next message: Crispin Cowan: "Re: Hooks, authority, MAC, the future and proposol"
- Previous message: Stephen Smalley: "Re: Hooks, authority, MAC, the future and proposol"
- In reply to: LA Walsh: "Hooks, authority, MAC, the future and proposol"
- Next in thread: Chris Wright: "Re: Hooks, authority, MAC, the future and proposol"
- Next in thread: Crispin Cowan: "Re: Hooks, authority, MAC, the future and proposol"
- Reply: Chris Wright: "Re: Hooks, authority, MAC, the future and proposol"
- Reply: richard offer: "Re: Hooks, authority, MAC, the future and proposol"
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
On Sun, Jul 08, 2001 at 04:29:07PM -0700, LA Walsh wrote:
>
> Given that audit requires more hooks than are currently
> present and making audit a stage II goal, when will that be
> addressed? What is the time frame for allowing audit hooks into
> LSM?
What is needed for "audit"? The ability to log every syscall entry and
exit with a timestamp, userid, parameters and return value? Or do you
mean something else? Do you have a pointer to the actual requirement?
thanks,
greg k-h
_______________________________________________
linux-security-module mailing list
linux-security-moduleat_private
http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module
- Next message: Crispin Cowan: "Re: Hooks, authority, MAC, the future and proposol"
- Previous message: Stephen Smalley: "Re: Hooks, authority, MAC, the future and proposol"
- In reply to: LA Walsh: "Hooks, authority, MAC, the future and proposol"
- Next in thread: Chris Wright: "Re: Hooks, authority, MAC, the future and proposol"
- Next in thread: Crispin Cowan: "Re: Hooks, authority, MAC, the future and proposol"
- Reply: Chris Wright: "Re: Hooks, authority, MAC, the future and proposol"
- Reply: richard offer: "Re: Hooks, authority, MAC, the future and proposol"
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30
: Mon Jul 09 2001 - 08:59:18 PDT