Next message: Chris Wright: "Re: initialization"
- Previous message: Serge E. Hallyn: "initialization"
- In reply to: Greg KH: "Re: Hooks, authority, MAC, the future and proposol"
- Next in thread: Greg KH: "Re: Hooks, authority, MAC, the future and proposol"
- Next in thread: Crispin Cowan: "Re: Hooks, authority, MAC, the future and proposol"
- Reply: Greg KH: "Re: Hooks, authority, MAC, the future and proposol"
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
* Greg KH (gregat_private) wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 08, 2001 at 04:29:07PM -0700, LA Walsh wrote:
> >
> > Given that audit requires more hooks than are currently
> > present and making audit a stage II goal, when will that be
> > addressed? What is the time frame for allowing audit hooks into
> > LSM?
>
> What is needed for "audit"? The ability to log every syscall entry and
> exit with a timestamp, userid, parameters and return value? Or do you
> mean something else? Do you have a pointer to the actual requirement?
>
I'd suspect the best place to look at specs for what Linda is talking
about is in the POSIX.1e draft.
http://www.guug.de/~winni/posix.1e/download.html
-chris
_______________________________________________
linux-security-module mailing list
linux-security-moduleat_private
http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module
- Next message: Chris Wright: "Re: initialization"
- Previous message: Serge E. Hallyn: "initialization"
- In reply to: Greg KH: "Re: Hooks, authority, MAC, the future and proposol"
- Next in thread: Greg KH: "Re: Hooks, authority, MAC, the future and proposol"
- Next in thread: Crispin Cowan: "Re: Hooks, authority, MAC, the future and proposol"
- Reply: Greg KH: "Re: Hooks, authority, MAC, the future and proposol"
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30
: Mon Jul 09 2001 - 12:00:21 PDT