* Alexander Reelsen (alexat_private) wrote: > Hi folks > > I just wanted to test the current lsm patch against 2.4.6 on my SMP > workstation. However this failed miserably, I was even unable to execute > an "ls" command. yeah, a SMP tester! thank you! we can't claim to be SMP safe. although i've run on a SMP machine without any problems a while back... in general some useful information is patch rev. (as you provided) and what security_ops you are using. the default (dummy) or capabilities. is it a module or compiled in? > I've read about SMP problems, but didn't think they're that hard. It might > be, that I've done some silly mistake I shouldn't have done, when doing > the kernel configuration. Is there anything that must be turned on or off? > > I've put an strace output of ls, along with the kernel error message and > the dmesg output after booting the system on > > http://tretmine.org/lsm thanks, i'm looking now. -chris _______________________________________________ linux-security-module mailing list linux-security-moduleat_private http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Jul 19 2001 - 11:03:26 PDT