Hi On Thu, Jul 19, 2001 at 11:00:03AM -0700, Chris Wright wrote: > yeah, a SMP tester! thank you! we can't claim to be SMP safe. > although i've run on a SMP machine without any problems a while back... > in general some useful information is patch rev. (as you provided) and what > security_ops you are using. the default (dummy) or capabilities. is it > a module or compiled in? Sorry not to provide that. I've compiled capabilities statically in as the kernel didn't boot with having it as a module (do not ask me why, it just stopped booting, and I have no clue why, I will try to reproduce it tomorrow). I didn't test it without capabilities yet. MfG/Regards, Alexander -- Alexander Reelsen http://joker.rhwd.de refat_private GnuPG: pub 1024D/F0D7313C sub 2048g/6AA2EDDB refat_private 7D44 F4E3 1993 FDDF 552E 7C88 EE9C CBD1 F0D7 313C Securing Debian: http://joker.rhwd.de/doc/Securing-Debian-HOWTO _______________________________________________ linux-security-module mailing list linux-security-moduleat_private http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Jul 19 2001 - 11:40:27 PDT