Re: Problems with 2.4.6-lsm on SMP

Previous message: Valdis.Kletnieksat_private: "Re: Names vs. Inodes"
In reply to: Alexander Reelsen: "Re: Problems with 2.4.6-lsm on SMP"
Next in thread: Greg KH: "Re: Problems with 2.4.6-lsm on SMP"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

chrisat_private

* Alexander Reelsen (alexat_private) wrote:
> Hi
> 
> On Thu, Jul 19, 2001 at 11:00:03AM -0700, Chris Wright wrote:
> > yeah, a SMP tester!  thank you!  we can't claim to be SMP safe.
> > although i've run on a SMP machine without any problems a while back...
> 
> > in general some useful information is patch rev. (as you provided) and what
> > security_ops you are using.  the default (dummy) or capabilities.  is it
> > a module or compiled in?
> Sorry not to provide that. I've compiled capabilities statically in as the
> kernel didn't boot with having it as a module (do not ask me why, it just
> stopped booting, and I have no clue why, I will try to reproduce it 
> tomorrow).
> 
> I didn't test it without capabilities yet.

looks like the capability_plug lost it's sysctl function.  i'll fix it,
and send it out ASAP.

-chris

_______________________________________________
linux-security-module mailing list
linux-security-moduleat_private
http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module