Re: Patch Acceptance Procedure

From: Greg KH (gregat_private)
Date: Wed Jul 25 2001 - 22:41:29 PDT

  • Next message: Greg KH: "Re: MAC before DAC vs DAC before MAC"

    On Mon, Jul 23, 2001 at 08:19:15PM -0400, jmjonesat_private wrote:
    > 
    > Proposed: passing fd's should be supported wherever possible in the
    > interface and will not constitute the sole reason for a rejection of a
    > patch.  Seconded?
    
    No.  I have only seen that audit and some vague hand waving about some
    other project that might possibly need fds.  Audit we are not doing
    right now, and vauge hand waving gets you no where.  Show me a real
    reason outside of audit that you need them.
    
    greg k-h
    
    _______________________________________________
    linux-security-module mailing list
    linux-security-moduleat_private
    http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Wed Jul 25 2001 - 22:43:22 PDT