On Mon, Jul 23, 2001 at 08:19:15PM -0400, jmjonesat_private wrote: > > Proposed: passing fd's should be supported wherever possible in the > interface and will not constitute the sole reason for a rejection of a > patch. Seconded? No. I have only seen that audit and some vague hand waving about some other project that might possibly need fds. Audit we are not doing right now, and vauge hand waving gets you no where. Show me a real reason outside of audit that you need them. greg k-h _______________________________________________ linux-security-module mailing list linux-security-moduleat_private http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Wed Jul 25 2001 - 22:43:22 PDT