Re: [PATCH] Authoritative hooks

Previous message: Greg KH: "How to get the most recent version of the LSM patch"
In reply to: jmjonesat_private: "Re: [PATCH] Authoritative hooks"
Next in thread: Stephen Smalley: "Re: [PATCH] Authoritative hooks"
Reply: Stephen Smalley: "Re: [PATCH] Authoritative hooks"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

sdsat_private

On Thu, 16 Aug 2001 jmjonesat_private wrote:

> I understand that you only want feedback from SGI with this patch, 
> but could somebody post a current patch against 2.4.7 to allow we
> less-enabled listeners to look at it?  Outside the current "standard
> path", of course.

My authoritative hooks patch was relative to the WireX BitKeeper tree 
just prior to the 2.4.9 import.  At that point, the WireX BitKeeper tree 
corresponded to the lsm-2001_08_12 patch against 2.4.8 plus my bug fix
patch for security_ops->capable/cap_capable calls.  So, to review my
authoritative hooks patch, you can apply lsm-2001_08_12 to 2.4.8, then
apply the bug fix patch from
http://mail.wirex.com/pipermail/linux-security-module/2001-August/001645.html,
then apply the authoritative hooks patch.

--
Stephen D. Smalley, NAI Labs
ssmalleyat_private

_______________________________________________
linux-security-module mailing list
linux-security-moduleat_private
http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module