On Fri, 17 Aug 2001, Seth Arnold wrote: > Wayne, is there any reason why you used an int to multiplex the same > hook between swapon and swapoff? > To save a hook. The 'int cmd' is either 0 or 1, for swapoff/swapon. For our purposes, one hook can handle both cases. > I was initially concerned that it was magic looking until I actually > lookd at the modified functions.. but I wonder how folks would prefer > one hook multiplexed by an int, or two hooks, one for each? > If the consensus is to have two hooks, that's not a problem. I was just trying to control both swap states from a single hook in order to remove an extra hook. There's not much complexity that this hook needs to deal with. Thanks, -- Wayne Salamon wsalamonat_private _______________________________________________ linux-security-module mailing list linux-security-moduleat_private http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Aug 17 2001 - 11:27:33 PDT