On Sat, Sep 01, 2001 at 10:56:07PM -0400, jmjonesat_private wrote: > > Not to 'tell tales out of school', but this is a very strong possibility, > imho, at this point. I don't know if it's a good or bad thing. What I'd > RATHER see is this: > > LSM presents "truely general" patch to 2.5. > > It gets accepted. > > All future kernels have this functionality inherent, and patches become > relative to THAT standard. I fully expect that to happen. But the patches would be much smaller than any patches against the current kernel tree, which is a good thing. I don't expect to solve everyone's hook problems, but over time most of them. thanks, greg k-h _______________________________________________ linux-security-module mailing list linux-security-moduleat_private http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sun Sep 02 2001 - 10:20:27 PDT