Re: quotactl hook

From: Greg KH (gregat_private)
Date: Sun Sep 02 2001 - 10:16:25 PDT

  • Next message: David Wheeler: "Re: quotactl hook (authoritative vs. restrictive)"

    On Sat, Sep 01, 2001 at 10:56:07PM -0400, jmjonesat_private wrote:
    > 
    > Not to 'tell tales out of school', but this is a very strong possibility,
    > imho, at this point.  I don't know if it's a good or bad thing.  What I'd
    > RATHER see is this:
    > 
    >   LSM presents "truely general" patch to 2.5.
    > 
    >   It gets accepted.
    > 
    >   All future kernels have this functionality inherent, and patches become
    >   relative to THAT standard.
    
    I fully expect that to happen.  But the patches would be much smaller
    than any patches against the current kernel tree, which is a good thing.
    
    I don't expect to solve everyone's hook problems, but over time most of
    them.
    
    thanks,
    
    greg k-h
    
    _______________________________________________
    linux-security-module mailing list
    linux-security-moduleat_private
    http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sun Sep 02 2001 - 10:20:27 PDT