Crispin Cowan wrote: > So no, mandatory GPL for LSM modules is not even close to acceptable. I agree with Crispin. For the LSM facility to be generally useful it must be available to all, including those whose license requirements differ from the "norm". It is very reasonable to expect LSM to be used to produce classified* security models, and a scheme which makes doing so difficult will impede the progress of Linux. --- * The virtue of classifications and government secrets is neither endorsed nor condemmed. -- Casey Schaufler Manager, Trust Technology, SGI caseyat_private voice: 650.933.1634 casey_pat_private Pager: 888.220.0607 _______________________________________________ linux-security-module mailing list linux-security-moduleat_private http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon Sep 24 2001 - 09:10:03 PDT