Re: Authoritative hooks updated to 2.4.13

From: Seth Arnold (sarnoldat_private)
Date: Fri Oct 26 2001 - 12:10:53 PDT

  • Next message: jmjonesat_private: "Re: Detecting missing hook functions"

    On Fri, Oct 26, 2001 at 11:31:54AM -0400, Stephen Smalley wrote:
    > 2) The rmb call in ptrace.  I see no valid reason to make this
    > conditional, and it just makes the code uglier.
    
    The reasoning for putting the rmb() in a conditional is to follow, as
    closely as possible within the limits of what the LSM patch intends to
    modify, the pre-LSM ptrace behavior.
    
    Given the extreme difficulties of keeping ptrace sane, I think this is a
    worth-while goal.
    
    -- 
    The Bill of Rights: 7 out of 10 rights haven't been sold yet! Contact
    your congressman for details how *you* can buy one today!
    
    _______________________________________________
    linux-security-module mailing list
    linux-security-moduleat_private
    http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Oct 26 2001 - 12:04:25 PDT