* Greg KH (gregat_private) wrote: > On Thu, Nov 01, 2001 at 10:54:34AM +1100, James Morris wrote: > > > > I don't have a problem with this, or removing the locking information, > > which is particularly bad if it's wrong. > > I don't like the locking information, as it too will quickly go out of > date. I'd rather just refer people to the kernel locking document that > someone at IBM is keeping, which details the placement of all kernel > locks. > > Module developers are going to have to be very aware of this, as the > locks have a tendency to disappear over time :) > > What does other people think? i agree. i don't see a pressing need for locking or called. -chris _______________________________________________ linux-security-module mailing list linux-security-moduleat_private http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Wed Oct 31 2001 - 16:23:20 PST