Re: Proposed documentation patch to security.h

From: Chris Wright (chrisat_private)
Date: Wed Oct 31 2001 - 16:17:57 PST

  • Next message: Chris Wright: "Re: Proposed documentation patch to security.h"

    * Greg KH (gregat_private) wrote:
    > On Thu, Nov 01, 2001 at 10:54:34AM +1100, James Morris wrote:
    > > 
    > > I don't have a problem with this, or removing the locking information,
    > > which is particularly bad if it's wrong.
    > 
    > I don't like the locking information, as it too will quickly go out of
    > date.  I'd rather just refer people to the kernel locking document that
    > someone at IBM is keeping, which details the placement of all kernel
    > locks.
    > 
    > Module developers are going to have to be very aware of this, as the
    > locks have a tendency to disappear over time :)
    > 
    > What does other people think?
    
    i agree.  i don't see a pressing need for locking or called.
    
    -chris
    
    _______________________________________________
    linux-security-module mailing list
    linux-security-moduleat_private
    http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Wed Oct 31 2001 - 16:23:20 PST