James Morris wrote: > > What about the possibility of creating an authorative branch in the LSM > repository which is maintained by SGI? Crispin suggested this to us earlier. We want to be sure that no one sees our differences as "fragmenting" or "splitting" the effort. We decline a branch to maintain (at least an appearance of) solidarity. UNLESS! Unless the branch is the official Phase II. We believe that would address all of the issues We can think of from my side. We expect it would raise a bunch elsewhere, and that's fair. -- Casey Schaufler Manager, Trust Technology, SGI caseyat_private voice: 650.933.1634 casey_pat_private Pager: 888.220.0607 _______________________________________________ linux-security-module mailing list linux-security-moduleat_private http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon Nov 05 2001 - 17:16:36 PST