On Mon, Nov 05, 2001 at 04:58:27PM -0800, Casey Schaufler wrote: > > Not, however, to meet the industry standard C2 or B1 feature sets. > I know, I know, there are 632 reasons why C2/B1 is irrelevent to > "real" security. That doesn't help when the customer asks the > question. Is LSM really worth presenting if it can't even support C2? Some of us don't care about C2 or "customers" or making Linux "better" than <other_system_name>. We just want to make Linux better than it currently is at this moment in time. The LSM patch provides a way to present _some_ different security models to users much easier than can be currently achieved, hence making the next version of Linux better than the previous one. thanks, greg k-h _______________________________________________ linux-security-module mailing list linux-security-moduleat_private http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon Nov 05 2001 - 17:20:46 PST