Re: [Linux-security-module-commit] lsm 2.5 tree change 1.2.1.19 1.2.1.20 1.2.1.21 1.2.1.22 1.2.1.23 1.2.1.24 1.2.1.25 1.2.1.26 1.2.1.27 1.2.1.28 1.2.1.29 1.2.1.30 1.294 1.295 1.296 1.297 1.298 1.299 1.300 1.2.1.31 1.301 1.302

Previous message: Greg KH: "Re: [RFC][PATCH] super block [alloc|free]_security"
In reply to: Greg KH: "Re: [Linux-security-module-commit] lsm 2.5 tree change 1.2.1.19 1.2.1.20 1.2.1.21 1.2.1.22 1.2.1.23 1.2.1.24 1.2.1.25 1.2.1.26 1.2.1.27 1.2.1.28 1.2.1.29 1.2.1.30 1.294 1.295 1.296 1.297 1.298 1.299 1.300 1.2.1.31 1.301 1.302"
Next in thread: Greg KH: "Re: [Linux-security-module-commit] lsm 2.5 tree change 1.2.1.19 1.2.1.20 1.2.1.21 1.2.1.22 1.2.1.23 1.2.1.24 1.2.1.25 1.2.1.26 1.2.1.27 1.2.1.28 1.2.1.29 1.2.1.30 1.294 1.295 1.296 1.297 1.298 1.299 1.300 1.2.1.31 1.301 1.302"
Reply: Greg KH: "Re: [Linux-security-module-commit] lsm 2.5 tree change 1.2.1.19 1.2.1.20 1.2.1.21 1.2.1.22 1.2.1.23 1.2.1.24 1.2.1.25 1.2.1.26 1.2.1.27 1.2.1.28 1.2.1.29 1.2.1.30 1.294 1.295 1.296 1.297 1.298 1.299 1.300 1.2.1.31 1.301 1.302"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

chrisat_private

* Greg KH (gregat_private) wrote:

> Ah, change your shutdown script, don't change the kernel :)
> 
> Seriously, you should put this fix back.  You're going to have to change
> your shutdown scripts anyway due to changes in usbdevfs...

i agree in sentiment, especially since it's an attempt to conform with
standards.  but it's a minor change and it's significantly simpler to
revert the change and get a functioning system for short testing.

got a simple change to the shutdown scripts?

cheers,
-chris

_______________________________________________
linux-security-module mailing list
linux-security-moduleat_private
http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module