Re: LSM Summer BOF's

Previous message: Crispin Cowan: "Re: LSM Summer BOF's"
In reply to: Crispin Cowan: "Re: LSM Summer BOF's"
Next in thread: Serge E. Hallyn: "Re: LSM Summer BOF's"
Next in thread: Russell Coker: "Re: LSM Summer BOF's"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

gregat_private

On Wed, Mar 20, 2002 at 11:10:38AM -0800, Crispin Cowan wrote:
> It seems to me that the scheduled LSM sessions are about LSM people 
> explaining it to the uninitiated, where as an LSM BOF is a meeting of 
> LSM developers trying to make decisions. The kind of hard-core debate I 
> expect at a BOF would lose most of the audience at Chris and Russel's talks.

You might be amazed at the level of technical discussion that happens in
OLS talks between the audience and the presenter.  This is a technical
conference.

But I agree, some outstanding design issues might be better hammered out
in a BOF or some such smaller meeting.

thanks,

greg k-h
_______________________________________________
linux-security-module mailing list
linux-security-moduleat_private
http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module