Crispin Cowan wrote: > Now lets just calm down. While that is possible, it is not clear that is > the case, and I dare say it is not even likely. What's likely happening > is that SCC geeks are having it out with SCC legal, and they don't want > to say ANYTHING until they can say something definitive. In this > context, removing the previous vague & confusing statement just seems > responsible. This is exactly the sort of issue we've been dealing with here at SGI regarding the work we've been doing. Avoiding this kind of Brewhaha is why we haven't put anything out yet. The differences between the corporate playpen and the Linux sandbox can be mind boggling at times. I hope that this will help y'all understand those of us who have been conservative a little bit better. -- Casey Schaufler Manager, Trust Technology, SGI caseyat_private voice: 650.933.1634 casey_pat_private Pager: 877.557.3184 _______________________________________________ linux-security-module mailing list linux-security-moduleat_private http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Jun 07 2002 - 11:45:27 PDT