Re: Regarding the Type Enforcement Licensing Discussion

From: Casey Schaufler (caseyat_private)
Date: Fri Jun 07 2002 - 11:43:39 PDT

  • Next message: Chris Wright: "OLS LSM BoF session"

    Crispin Cowan wrote:
    > Now lets just calm down. While that is possible, it is not clear that is
    > the case, and I dare say it is not even likely. What's likely happening
    > is that SCC geeks are having it out with SCC legal, and they don't want
    > to say ANYTHING until they can say something definitive. In this
    > context, removing the previous vague & confusing statement just seems
    > responsible.
    This is exactly the sort of issue we've been dealing with here
    at SGI regarding the work we've been doing. Avoiding this kind
    of Brewhaha is why we haven't put anything out yet. The
    differences between the corporate playpen and the Linux sandbox
    can be mind boggling at times. I hope that this will help
    y'all understand those of us who have been conservative a little
    bit better.
    Casey Schaufler				Manager, Trust Technology, SGI
    caseyat_private				voice: 650.933.1634
    casey_pat_private			Pager: 877.557.3184
    linux-security-module mailing list

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Jun 07 2002 - 11:45:27 PDT