* Greg KH (gregat_private) wrote: > On Thu, Jun 13, 2002 at 10:04:44AM -0700, richard offer wrote: > > > > Is this the best way to send a patch generated by bk makepatch ? Or would > > people rather have a traditional patch ? > > The preferred method is to use the bksend script, which can be found in > the Documentation/BK-usage directory in the 2.5 kernel tree. Of course, traditional patches are still fine as well ;-) And if your tree is public we can pull from it to do the merge. The main nicety of bksend is it gives a bk changeset _plus_ a readable diff. > Thanks, but I already made this change to the tree :) Greg, your change is not the same as Richard's, so I've pulled in his change as well. Now, both the 2.4 trees and the 2.5 tree should contain consistent IA-64 __NR_security macros and the proper sys_security slot in the syscall tables. thanks, -chris -- Linux Security Modules http://lsm.immunix.org http://lsm.bkbits.net _______________________________________________ linux-security-module mailing list linux-security-moduleat_private http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 12:21:22 PDT