Re: Module Identifier

From: Greg KH (gregat_private)
Date: Wed Jun 19 2002 - 13:54:03 PDT

  • Next message: Crispin Cowan: "Re: Module Identifier"

    On Wed, Jun 19, 2002 at 01:32:44PM -0700, Crispin Cowan wrote:
    > I propose that start maintaining a registry of known 
    > module IDs. 
    Bleah, I don't like this.  Like Richard said, if you want to worry about
    collisions, try part of the MD5.
    LANNA should be used if you want to track numbers, but since the LSM
    patch isn't in the kernel, it would be pointless to ask them.
    And it would be pointless to set up a web interface, if we aren't even
    sure the number will survive in the "final" lsm version.
    I would think that the time it would take to set up the web interface
    would be better spend getting the site working :)
    greg k-h
    linux-security-module mailing list

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Wed Jun 19 2002 - 13:56:21 PDT