Re: OLS Bof info

Previous message: Chris Wright: "Re: OLS Bof info"
In reply to: MAILER-DAEMONat_private: "Re: OLS Bof info"
Next in thread: richard offer: "Re: OLS Bof info"
Next in thread: Chris Wright: "Re: OLS Bof info"
Reply: richard offer: "Re: OLS Bof info"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

chrisat_private

* richard offer (richardat_private) wrote:
> 
> I think we need to support running older modules on newer LSM 
> infrastructures, otherwise we're going to get into a viscious circle of 
> version-chicken (a module wants version LSM version X, version X wants 
> kernel Y, but I also need kernel Z (LSM version != X) because that is the 
> only version for which feature Q is available)...

No, we don't want this.  Kernel subsystems are particular to kernel
version.  If you have these needs you are porting to kernel version Z.

thanks,
-chris
-- 
Linux Security Modules     http://lsm.immunix.org     http://lsm.bkbits.net
_______________________________________________
linux-security-module mailing list
linux-security-moduleat_private
http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module