Re: TE/DTE Patent issues?

Previous message: Chris Wright: "Re: OLS Bof info"
In reply to: Clint Byrum: "RE: TE/DTE Patent issues?"
Next in thread: Russell Coker: "Re: TE/DTE Patent issues?"
Next in thread: Scott Shealy: "RE: TE/DTE Patent issues?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

chrisat_private

* Clint Byrum (cbyrumat_private) wrote:
> 
> I think I have decided that, while SELinux and Type Enforcement(tm...
> hehe) are the right way to do this, I'd rather not deal with the
> licensing issues. What is the best alternative? My inclination is to use
> GRSecurity to accomplish some of the fine grained access control
> necessary for a highly secure system, but I'm guessing you folks have
> other suggestions.

We are all looking forward to resolution on the patent issue.  Of course,
with things like GPL, patents, and lawyers involved it clearly will not
be resolved overnight.

You may look at LIDS in the LSM tree.  It is GPL licensed and has an
access control model which may serve your needs.  Also, if you like
GRSecurity, porting its access control model to LSM would be a nice
thing to see ;-)

cheers,
-chris
-- 
Linux Security Modules     http://lsm.immunix.org     http://lsm.bkbits.net
_______________________________________________
linux-security-module mailing list
linux-security-moduleat_private
http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module