Re: New hooks for sock structure

From: Chris Wright (chrisat_private)
Date: Thu Jul 11 2002 - 10:31:31 PDT

  • Next message: Greg KH: "Re: Submitting LSM (Was: Re: OLS Bof info)"

    * Wayne Salamon (wsalamonat_private) wrote:
    > On Wed, 10 Jul 2002, Chris Wright wrote:
    > 
    > > Yeah, I understand the need, it's just awkward.  It would be nice to find
    > > a way that's cleaner.
    > 
    >   We're working on it, with some suggestions from James.
    
    Great.
    
    >   Understood.  In the 2.5 case, we don't have this second check on sk
    > because the code was restructured. In the 2.4 case, though, I wanted to
    > keep the LSM additions contained, without restructuring the existing code.
    
    Ah, I looked primarily at the 2.4 patch; thanks for illuminating the
    distinction.  Really, the 2.5 case is the one we care about most.
    
    thanks,
    -chris
    --
    Linux Security Modules     http://lsm.immunix.org     http://lsm.bkbits.net
    _______________________________________________
    linux-security-module mailing list
    linux-security-moduleat_private
    http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Jul 11 2002 - 10:33:32 PDT