On Sun, Aug 25, 2002 at 08:44:55PM -0700, Crispin Cowan wrote: > Why is it difficult to change the module registration interface so that > a module can specify an ID number if it wants to? Let it specify 0 if it > doesn't want to play with the stacker. Because 99.99% of the modules will not have an id, or want to be stacked. > I'm not married to any of this, but I don't see huge cost to David's > request, and I do see some cost (and uglies) to the kludges he will have > to employ to work around it. I don't see either a cost, ugly, or kludges in my pseudo code. But I'm probably biased :) What do you object about it? thanks, greg k-h _______________________________________________ linux-security-module mailing list linux-security-moduleat_private http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sun Aug 25 2002 - 20:52:22 PDT