There didn't appear to be any opposition to the sb_kern_mount hook. Any objections to committing the sb_kern_mount patches to the lsm-2.4 and lsm-2.5 BitKeeper trees? On a different note, it would be good if the remaining hooks (IPC, miscellaneous system, and socket/networking) could be submitted to the appropriate maintainers soon so that there is time for feedback and revisions before the feature freeze date. -- Stephen D. Smalley, NAI Labs ssmalleyat_private On Wed, 18 Sep 2002, Stephen Smalley wrote: > The attached patches add a sb_kern_mount hook to the kernel do_kern_mount > function to permit initialization of the superblock security information > for all superblock objects at a point where sufficient information is > available to perform such initialization, at least for SELinux. For > SELinux, this hook obsoletes the sb_check_sb and sb_post_addmount hooks > and provides better coverage, reducing the dependency on > superblock_precondition. Comments? _______________________________________________ linux-security-module mailing list linux-security-moduleat_private http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon Sep 23 2002 - 09:47:54 PDT