On Mon, 23 Sep 2002, Stephen Smalley wrote: > > There didn't appear to be any opposition to the sb_kern_mount hook. Any > objections to committing the sb_kern_mount patches to the lsm-2.4 and > lsm-2.5 BitKeeper trees? Nope. > > On a different note, it would be good if the remaining hooks (IPC, > miscellaneous system, and socket/networking) could be submitted to the > appropriate maintainers soon so that there is time for feedback and > revisions before the feature freeze date. > Agreed. - James -- James Morris <jmorrisat_private> _______________________________________________ linux-security-module mailing list linux-security-moduleat_private http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Tue Sep 24 2002 - 07:33:35 PDT