On Fri, Dec 27, 2002 at 10:45:16AM -0500, David Wheeler wrote: > > I guess a simple benchmark is the "untar and recompile the kernel" > benchmark. I can run the benchmark (1) with OWLSM as the primary > (which embeds capability), and (2) using stacker, and with two > secondaries (OWLSM patched + capability). That should be > a pretty fair test to show what the overhead is. A better benchmark is lmbench for micro results and the contest test for macro ones: http://members.optusnet.com.au/ckolivas/contest/ which a lot of people are using these days to test out mm changes to the kernel. Hope this helps, greg k-h _______________________________________________ linux-security-module mailing list linux-security-moduleat_private http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Dec 27 2002 - 15:42:08 PST