sys_security() status ?

Previous message: linuxmoduleat_private: "Strange thing"
Next in thread: Russell Coker: "Re: sys_security() status ?"
Reply: Russell Coker: "Re: sys_security() status ?"
Reply: Stephen Smalley: "Re: sys_security() status ?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

biondi@cartel-securite.fr

Hi all,

I've seen long threads about removing or not sys_security().
I've seen that latest lsm patches for 2.4 and 2.5 have it.
I've seen that 2.6.0-test2 does not have it.

I don't want to trigger another flamewar about pros and cons.

Is there any definitive status about its presence or absence in LSM ?
If so, what is this status ?

Best regards, Phil.

-- 
Philippe Biondi <biondi@ cartel-securite.fr> Cartel Sécurité
Security Consultant/R&D                      http://www.cartel-securite.fr
PGP KeyID:3D9A43E2  FingerPrint:C40A772533730E39330DC0985EE8FF5F3D9A43E2

_______________________________________________
linux-security-module mailing list
linux-security-moduleat_private
http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module