Re: sys_security() status ?

From: Russell Coker (russellat_private)
Date: Thu Aug 21 2003 - 03:19:12 PDT

  • Next message: BIONDI Philippe: "Re: sys_security() status ?"

    On Thu, 21 Aug 2003 19:59, Philippe Biondi wrote:
    > I've seen long threads about removing or not sys_security().
    > I've seen that latest lsm patches for 2.4 and 2.5 have it.
    > I've seen that 2.6.0-test2 does not have it.
    >
    > I don't want to trigger another flamewar about pros and cons.
    >
    > Is there any definitive status about its presence or absence in LSM ?
    > If so, what is this status ?
    
    2.6.0test3 also does not have it, and the back-port of the new LSM to 2.4.21 
    that's available on the NSA web site also does not have it.
    
    Don't expect much support for sys_security() in the future.  2.6.0test3 is the 
    way that's being used for future LSM development.
    
    -- 
    http://www.coker.com.au/selinux/   My NSA Security Enhanced Linux packages
    http://www.coker.com.au/bonnie++/  Bonnie++ hard drive benchmark
    http://www.coker.com.au/postal/    Postal SMTP/POP benchmark
    http://www.coker.com.au/~russell/  My home page
    
    _______________________________________________
    linux-security-module mailing list
    linux-security-moduleat_private
    http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Aug 21 2003 - 03:21:02 PDT