On Thu, 21 Aug 2003, Russell Coker wrote: > On Thu, 21 Aug 2003 19:59, Philippe Biondi wrote: > > I've seen long threads about removing or not sys_security(). > > I've seen that latest lsm patches for 2.4 and 2.5 have it. > > I've seen that 2.6.0-test2 does not have it. > > > > I don't want to trigger another flamewar about pros and cons. > > > > Is there any definitive status about its presence or absence in LSM ? > > If so, what is this status ? > > 2.6.0test3 also does not have it, and the back-port of the new LSM to 2.4.21 > that's available on the NSA web site also does not have it. > > Don't expect much support for sys_security() in the future. 2.6.0test3 is the > way that's being used for future LSM development. > To be clear, that means that sys_security() does not exist anymore, right ? Could documentation be updated ? Moreover, I've not seen any patch for 2.4 with it removed. It may be very recent.. Thanks. Best regards, Phil. _______________________________________________ linux-security-module mailing list linux-security-moduleat_private http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Aug 21 2003 - 03:33:24 PDT