On Thu, 21 Aug 2003 20:31, BIONDI Philippe wrote: > > Don't expect much support for sys_security() in the future. 2.6.0test3 > > is the way that's being used for future LSM development. > > To be clear, that means that sys_security() does not exist anymore, right ? Yes. > Could documentation be updated ? Which documentation do you refer to? The LSM web site doesn't get updated often. > Moreover, I've not seen any patch for 2.4 with it removed. It may be very > recent.. At the following URL for downloading SE Linux there is an option "Download new 2.4-based SELinux" which includes a LSM kernel patch without sys_security (among many other things). http://www.nsa.gov/selinux/download.html This release from the NSA happened a week ago and was the first release of the new LSM for 2.4.x kernels. So it is quite new in the 2.4.x tree. In 2.5.x and 2.6.0test it's been there for a while, but it's been in a state of rapid development (which probably explains the lack of documentation you refer to). -- http://www.coker.com.au/selinux/ My NSA Security Enhanced Linux packages http://www.coker.com.au/bonnie++/ Bonnie++ hard drive benchmark http://www.coker.com.au/postal/ Postal SMTP/POP benchmark http://www.coker.com.au/~russell/ My home page _______________________________________________ linux-security-module mailing list linux-security-moduleat_private http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Aug 21 2003 - 04:20:26 PDT