On Thu, 2004-12-16 at 18:00, Serge Hallyn wrote: > The attached patch is virtually the same as Chris', compiled and > "tested". A quick while (1) malloc(100000000) test seemed to give the > desired result. Is that an appopriate test? > > If so, are there any objections to the patch? dummy module has the same duplication, and it also is not up-to-date with the latest logic that exists in the capability module. -- Stephen Smalley <sds@private> National Security Agency
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Thu Dec 16 2004 - 13:54:36 PST