Ok. Actually, this points out what should have been a problem before - I guess __vm_enough_memory should be in security.c? Or actually just in dummy.c Otherwise commoncap.c will always be required for dummy.c (and selinux). -serge On Thu, 2004-12-16 at 16:48 -0500, Stephen Smalley wrote: > On Thu, 2004-12-16 at 18:00, Serge Hallyn wrote: > > The attached patch is virtually the same as Chris', compiled and > > "tested". A quick while (1) malloc(100000000) test seemed to give the > > desired result. Is that an appopriate test? > > > > If so, are there any objections to the patch? > > dummy module has the same duplication, and it also is not up-to-date > with the latest logic that exists in the capability module. > -- Serge Hallyn <serue@private>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Fri Dec 17 2004 - 08:25:15 PST