Karl MacMillan wrote: >>I strongly believe that this is not the place to play "my module is >>better than your module." I brought up the differences only to dispel >>the claim that SELinux is so general that it can subsume all other >>modules. If people stop arguing to remove LSM and replace it with >>SELinux, then I will stop bitching about what I perceive are the >>limitations of SELinux. At least here :) >> >Interesting . . . at no point did I say SELinux was better than anything or, >actually, argue for the removal of LSM. > No, but other people did. As I said, I brought up the AppArmor/SELinux comparison only to demonstrate that ditching LSM in favor of SELinux is a bad idea. Crispin -- Crispin Cowan, Ph.D. http://immunix.com/~crispin/ Director of Software Engineering, Novell http://novell.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Wed May 25 2005 - 21:12:11 PDT