Re: New stacker performance results

From: Crispin Cowan (crispin@private)
Date: Wed May 25 2005 - 21:11:17 PDT

Karl MacMillan wrote:
>>I strongly believe that this is not the place to play "my module is
>>better than your module." I brought up the differences only to dispel
>>the claim that SELinux is so general that it can subsume all other
>>modules. If people stop arguing to remove LSM and replace it with
>>SELinux, then I will stop bitching about what I perceive are the
>>limitations of SELinux. At least here :)
>Interesting . . . at no point did I say SELinux was better than anything or,
>actually, argue for the removal of LSM.
No, but other people did. As I said, I brought up the AppArmor/SELinux
comparison only to demonstrate that ditching LSM in favor of SELinux is
a bad idea.

Crispin Cowan, Ph.D.            
Director of Software Engineering, Novell

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Wed May 25 2005 - 21:12:11 PDT