Hi Tony, On Sun, Jul 03, 2005 at 12:00:07PM -0700, Tony Jones wrote: > Agree with James, pls resend to linux-security-module@private Done. > The topic of replacing dummy (with capability) was discussed there > last week, in the context of stacker, but a common solution for both > cases would be needed. Both cases? > Also, I was going to ask where 4/5 and 5/5 were :-) They were part of my previous submission attempts as indicated in the first message [Patch 0/3]. Last time I sent them people were discussing whether or not we should have this likely/unlikely, so I left this out this time, as I'd rather prefer discussing the other patches. Still, the 3% perf. increase measurement that has been done was with patches 4 and 5, so claiming otherwise would not be right. > If you are claiming a perf increase it would be nice to get an idea > what these patches were even though you believe most of the gain was > in patch #3. For completeness, find both attached. Best, -- Kurt Garloff, Director SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Mon Jul 04 2005 - 00:00:15 PDT