Re: [logs] log review policies

From: Jason Haar (Jason.Haarat_private)
Date: Tue Oct 16 2001 - 20:26:46 PDT

Next message: Jeanne Heicher: "[logs] HEAD requests"

Previous message: Richard Welty: "Re[2]: [logs] log review policies"
In reply to: peff-loganalat_private: "Re: [logs] log review policies"
Next in thread: Richard Welty: "Re[2]: [logs] log review policies"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Tue, Oct 16, 2001 at 03:47:26AM -0400, peff-loganalat_private wrote:
> > Well, you don't have to use sendmail. There are still Postfix and qmail.
> 
> For the record, I am using qmail; it's trivial to set up local-only
> delivery.

For the record, I'm also a die-hard qmail user, but if you check out
sendmail under Redhat 7.1 workstation, you'll see it installs sendmail bound
only to 127.0.0.1 - gets around the problem nicely too :-)

-- 
Cheers

Jason Haar

Information Security Manager
Trimble Navigation Ltd.
Phone: +64 3 9635 377 Fax: +64 3 9635 417

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: loganalysis-unsubscribeat_private
For additional commands, e-mail: loganalysis-helpat_private

Next message: Jeanne Heicher: "[logs] HEAD requests"
Previous message: Richard Welty: "Re[2]: [logs] log review policies"
In reply to: peff-loganalat_private: "Re: [logs] log review policies"
Next in thread: Richard Welty: "Re[2]: [logs] log review policies"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Wed Oct 17 2001 - 08:03:33 PDT