Re: [logs] immutable bit

From: Drew (simonisat_private)
Date: Mon Mar 18 2002 - 12:41:49 PST

Next message: Sweth Chandramouli: "Re: [logs] Sentry/Counterpane how is it working ?"

Previous message: Drew: "Re: [logs] Sentry/Counterpane how is it working ?"
In reply to: Alexandre Dulaunoy: "Re: [logs] immutable bit"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Alexandre Dulaunoy wrote:
> 
> I have seen some functionnality of that under the acl and setacl function
> in trusted solaris but I think the "immutable" bit will (is?) in Solaris 9
> ?
> 
> setacl and acl is specific to mandatory acces control in trusted solaris,
> I think.
> 

FACLs are not specific to Trusted Solaris.  They've been in the 
OS since 2.6.  They also don't relate to immutable or append-only
files in the least.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: loganalysis-unsubscribeat_private
For additional commands, e-mail: loganalysis-helpat_private

Next message: Sweth Chandramouli: "Re: [logs] Sentry/Counterpane how is it working ?"
Previous message: Drew: "Re: [logs] Sentry/Counterpane how is it working ?"
In reply to: Alexandre Dulaunoy: "Re: [logs] immutable bit"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon Mar 18 2002 - 16:58:39 PST