Hello, >> However, we have seen that the "received at" timestamp is the most >> valuable, especially if the devices follow syslog RFC which prohibits TZ >> information in the syslog time stamp... > We are planning to have an option to ignore that "no TZ permitted" > part of the RFC. It is clearly broken. The only alternative is to > log in UTC, but that's often inconvenient for humans. The logical solution to that problem would be to log in UTC and have timezone adaptions in a user interface for viewing the logs. -- Wolfgang Zenker Mail: W.Zenkerat_private JPAVES Unix Online GmbH Fon: (+49) 721 / 955 40 60 Kaiserallee 87 Fax: (+49) 721 / 955 40 62 D-76185 Karlsruhe Web: www.jpaves.com _______________________________________________ LogAnalysis mailing list LogAnalysisat_private http://lists.shmoo.com/mailman/listinfo/loganalysis
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon Dec 09 2002 - 11:01:46 PST