RE: [logs] SDSC Secure Syslog

From: Rainer Gerhards (rgerhardsat_private)
Date: Wed Dec 11 2002 - 14:01:04 PST

  • Next message: Rainer Gerhards: "RE: [logs] Firewall One and Syslog"

    > Hear, hear!
    > 
    > Marcus has revived the conversation I started back in, oh, 
    > August, about what conditions we'd like to have logged in the 
    > first place.
    > 
    > Although changing every bit of app code out there is an 
    > overwhelming prospect, I have it on Good Authority that at 
    > least a couple of my buddies in the open source community are 
    > implementing a few of my ideas about things that Should Be 
    > Logged.  I'm trying to write up a summary of where the list 
    > left the conversation so we can publish something.
    
    From the non-open-source community (I know it's not that s*exy these
    days;)) : we would definitely support such a movement if there will be
    at least a minimal consensus... Maybe it even fits into the IETF syslog
    WG - as part of the message content not yet (really) defined...
    
    I know there are some obections about XML (I myself have some), but I
    think a very simple XML format would solve some of the issues and also
    provide extensibility....
    
    Rainer Gerhards
    Adiscon
    _______________________________________________
    LogAnalysis mailing list
    LogAnalysisat_private
    http://lists.shmoo.com/mailman/listinfo/loganalysis
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Wed Dec 11 2002 - 14:35:07 PST