Andrew Ross wrote: > > Sounds good to me. > > Are you going to put the hostname AND host address as required fields? Wouldn't that break things needlessly? One would think recommending fully qualified host names to be enough? > Also, it should be stated in the spec that a collector must not modify > the address or hostname when it forwards the message. This will then > allow us to pass it via many collectors and still retain the original > address of the sender. Agree fervently. The requirement to alter the hostname when forwarding is just plain b0rken. > The peer address of the collector forwarding the message can be obtained > from the socket if required. Definately. -- Mikael Olsson, Clavister AB Storgatan 12, Box 393, SE-891 28 ÖRNSKÖLDSVIK, Sweden Phone: +46 (0)660 29 92 00 Mobile: +46 (0)70 26 222 05 Fax: +46 (0)660 122 50 WWW: http://www.clavister.com _______________________________________________ LogAnalysis mailing list LogAnalysisat_private http://lists.shmoo.com/mailman/listinfo/loganalysis
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Jan 10 2003 - 12:24:33 PST