I unfortunately was taken away with some urgent work so I couldn't follow the list the past 4 days or so. I was also unable to continue the SELP spec over the weekend, but intend to do so very soon. I am right now catching up with the postings. My apologies if I have missed an important comment by the time I write this... > > The document doesn't clearly express what the combined end > result of > > all the fields is meant to look like as output. While the > timestamp > > does come after the PRI field, what about the HOSTNAME field ? > > I believe all of the above are addressed by the last > paragraph of section 1. Introduction: > > I DO NOT INTEND TO DUPLICATE [RFC3164] HERE. As such, this memo > lists only the differences to [RFC3164]. I am using the original > chapter numbers to list them. > > That very definitely seems to me like the right approach to > be taking at this point. If ever we decide we want to try to > push this through IETF into a real RFC (and I wouldn't begin > to try until we can demonstrate, with a load of working > implementations while there are none for RFC 3195, that the > gap between 3164 and 3195 needs filling in), then might be > the time to do a merge of 3164 and selp.txt to produce a > standalone spec. I begin to feel that it might be an better approach to merge the specs right now. As it is, it seems to be misleading. Or it might be a good approach to list the missing sections and provide just a "See RFC3164 for reference" content. Also, I have seen that the SELP name seems to have become widely used. It may be to late to pick up a comment from Kyle R. Hoffman: >> - does a name other than "syslog over tcp" make sense? is the one I have >> choosen ok? Any other suggestions? > >Simpler names are better, and "event log" has a well-established in the Windows world, if >I'm not mistaken. I suggest that you call it "Simple Log Protocol" (SLP). I agree that "event log" sounds a little "Windowish" and maybe misleading. So I, too, would like to switch to SLP name. What are the groups thoughts? Rainer _______________________________________________ LogAnalysis mailing list LogAnalysisat_private http://lists.shmoo.com/mailman/listinfo/loganalysis
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Tue Jan 14 2003 - 14:41:15 PST