> How would it needlessly break things ? > > We're already defining a new mesage so why be concerned about > another change ? I personally would like to keep change as minimal as possible. I still have the feeling that SELP (or SLP) will only be an interim solution on the way to RFC3195. At least I would like to ensure that a relay can be created with as minimal work as possible and without the need to discuss which information needs to be dropped. Actually, I believe that these things should go into the payload part (something that is currently being reviewed here on the list but needs some more formalization). If that information goes as a tag in payload, it can travel over RFC3164, 3195,SELP, syslog-sign and whatever will be out there. Rainer _______________________________________________ LogAnalysis mailing list LogAnalysisat_private http://lists.shmoo.com/mailman/listinfo/loganalysis
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Tue Jan 14 2003 - 14:45:34 PST