Re: [logs] Correlation Whitepaper

From: Marcus J. Ranum (mjrat_private)
Date: Mon May 19 2003 - 19:26:11 PDT

  • Next message: Jason Haar: "Re: [logs] Correlation Whitepaper"

    Ganu Skop wrote:
    >Couldn't find a correlation howto on the list.
    
    That's because "correlation" is something everyone wants,
    but nobody even knows what it _is_. It's like "liberty" or
    "free beer" - everyone thinks it's a great idea and we should
    all have it, but there's no roadmap for getting from here to
    there.
    
    You might want to take a look at the various literature for
    network management event correlation and fault detection
    or fault inference. A few google searches is all it takes.
    But - here's a preview - most of what passes for "event
    correlation" in the network management world consists
    of simple stuff like:
            - cluster events in time by IP source
            - cluster events into counted groups
                    (i.e.: 1,000 alerts saying "route failed"
                    get turned into 1 alert saying
                    "route failed 1,000 times")
            - given a codebook/rulebase when event X
                    occurs at the same time as event Y
                    call them event Z
    
    So, there's no rocket science going on. It's a great
    opportunity. :)
    
    mjr. 
    ---
    Marcus J. Ranum				http://www.ranum.com
    Computer and Communications Security	mjrat_private
    
    _______________________________________________
    LogAnalysis mailing list
    LogAnalysisat_private
    http://lists.shmoo.com/mailman/listinfo/loganalysis
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Tue May 20 2003 - 10:15:52 PDT