Re: [logs] Fwanalog/analog performance guidelines?

From: Jason Haar (Jason.Haar@private)
Date: Wed Mar 03 2004 - 14:46:30 PST

  • Next message: Clark, Bill W.: "RE: [logs] Fwanalog/analog performance guidelines?"

    On Thu, 2004-03-04 at 10:19, Clark, Bill W. wrote:
    > Anybody have any recommendations on how to speed up fwanalog or analog?
    > ...
    > the CPU is hardly even working and memory isn't taxed.  Just looking for
    > rules of thumb as to how long fwanalog/analog take to run generally and
    > if there are any steps that improve the timeline.
    
    DNS, DNS, DNS. Check you haven't enabled DNS resolution. If you are
    going through a multitude of IP addresses - trying to resolve them - it
    *will* add hours to the processing. 
    
    
    Cheers
    
    Jason Haar
    Information Security Manager, Trimble Navigation Ltd.
    Phone: +64 3 9635 377 Fax: +64 3 9635 417
    PGP Fingerprint: 7A2E 0407 C9A6 CAF6 2B9F 8422 C063 5EBB FE1D 66D1
    
    
    _______________________________________________
    LogAnalysis mailing list
    LogAnalysis@private
    http://lists.shmoo.com/mailman/listinfo/loganalysis
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Wed Mar 03 2004 - 14:50:56 PST