On Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at 08:25:16PM -0000, John Lampe wrote: > > - it's not the fastest on earth (manually supervised, > > but it will change in the future) > > Really? IMO, securescanx scanned a little too fast. I ran a scan against a > /24 range of addresses off of a T-1 connection with both Nessus and > vigilante whilst running a packet sniffer off of the spanned default gw > port....The vigilante was so aggressive that it missed many of the ports I wasn't referring to the packet-rate speed, but to the <start the test>-<get the report> cycle. As automated test results are manually reviewed, it could take 24/48 hours to be able to get the report after the scan has finished. bye, -- 'Why do you close your eyes?' 'So that the room will be empty.' zen@kill-9.it . Geek . And proud of it . http://www.kill-9.it/jargon/html/entry/zen.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- This list is provided by the SecurityFocus Security Intelligence Alert (SIA) Service. For more information on SecurityFocus' SIA service which automatically alerts you to the latest security vulnerabilities please see: https://alerts.securityfocus.com/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Nov 30 2001 - 07:48:41 PST