RE: Scanners and unpublished vulnerabilities - Full Disclosure

From: Ryan Russell (ryanat_private)
Date: Tue May 28 2002 - 22:28:11 PDT

  • Next message: R. DuFresne: "Re: Scanners and unpublished vulnerabilities - Full Disclosure"

    On Tue, 28 May 2002, Deus, Attonbitus wrote:
    > Let's put this in perspective.  You supplied exploit code for the idq
    > vulnerability.  All manner of folk blamed you (incorrectly) for Code Red
    
    Minor nit: eEye did not release any exploit code for the ida/idq to the
    public.  They said they were going to in the initial release of their
    advisory, and later changed their minds.  In fact, if you're paying close
    attention, that vulnerability is when they quit releasing exploits with
    their advisories.
    
    If you look at Code Red, the guy who wrote that exploit didn't need any
    help, and even came up with the %u technique while he was at it.  The eEye
    guys had a couple of comments in their advisory that were directed at
    anyone who would have been capable of reproducing the work.  I.e. anyone
    who could follow the comments, didn't need them to produce an exploit.
    
    Just wanted to clarify.  I keep seeing this repeated, and it's turning
    into one of those infosec urban legends, like Kevin hacking NORAD or being
    on the FBI most wanted list.
    
    					Ryan
    
    
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
    This list is provided by the SecurityFocus Security Intelligence Alert (SIA)
    Service. For more information on SecurityFocus' SIA service which
    automatically alerts you to the latest security vulnerabilities please see:
    https://alerts.securityfocus.com/
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Wed May 29 2002 - 08:12:51 PDT